Showing posts with label Michael Haneke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Haneke. Show all posts

Monday, 21 January 2013

Amour.



There is certainly no doubt in my mind that the German born director Michael Haneke is a master filmmaker. His name on the credits is reason enough to see a film and his latest movie Amour (2012) is a superb example of this mans sophisticated, challenging dramas. The cool precise direction manifests itself in the precise detail, the unhurried camera work that’s never afraid to linger and his use of long static takes to emphasize a point or an important moment. Using little or no incidental music his work always gives us an in depth study of human quality with all it’s weaknesses and strengths, in films like Funny Games (1997) where two young men enter uninvited the holiday home of a young family with the sole intent of murdering them, a film which skilfully evokes a very violent undertone without showing the act, The Piano Teacher (2001) about a female pianists masochistic obsession with her student, The Time of the Wolf (2003) a post-apocalyptic drama, in Cache (2005) we find a liberal intellectual haunted by fears of the exposure of a shameful childhood and The White Ribbon (2009) darkly depicts society and family in a German village just prior the second world war.



Jean-Louis Trintignant 

Amour is about compassion and the love between two people, not young love but a love that has grown from initial teenage lust through the birth of your children to a mutual loving respect in your later years. Our two leads, 82 years old Jean-Louis Trintignant and the beautiful 85-year-old Emmanuelle Riva, play George and Anne Laurent an elderly Parisian couple who live alone in a spacious flat in an upmarket apartment block. We first encounter the couple at a piano recital by one of Anne’s ex-students. Its obvious from the start that this couple are very much in love and don’t have a lot of time for other people even their grown up daughter Eve, played by Haneke regular Isabelle Huppert, appears an intruder in their lives. One morning Anne has a funny turn and on investigation it turns out to be a blocked carotid artery. The operation goes wrong and she is left partially paralysed making George promise never to allow her to go into hospital or residential care. Although not in particularly good health himself George is tasked with the care of his wife without normal palliative support. The film is based on an identical situation that happened to Haneke's 90-year-old Aunt and the issue that interested him the most was: "How to manage the suffering of someone you love?"


Emmanuelle Riva.

In this disturbing and moving depiction of Anne’s mental and physical deterioration Haneke never shy’s away from the living horrors of old age, immobility, dementia, and incontinence and done in his normal no nonsense manner with no recourse to sentimentality.  This writer and director has been quoted as saying that his films are easier to make than to watch which certainly is a truism, my wife, who accompanied me to the screening, had been at her mothers bedside when she passed away four days prior to seeing this movie, found it extremely difficult to stay the course. Will we all get to a stage in life were being capable of wiping your love ones arse rather than bringing them a bunch of flowers, proves more than love, more a life long devotion.

Haneke regular Isabelle Huppert.

My friend and film club colleague described the film as a harrowing watch but went on to say that he thought the film  a well crafted piece of work which emphasises just how unnecessary musical soundtracks and sharp editing really are. I felt it was really clever to show her playing the piano when the sound was actually coming from the cd player, as this prepared the audience to accept her leading him out of the flat at the end. Without the first bit the end-piece would not have worked, and the 'effect' was only used the two times. The pacing of the scenes was mesmerising’[1].

Michael Haneke receiving the Palme d'Or.

Not only did Haneke’s film win the Palme d’Or at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival but has surprisingly been nominated in the Best Film category, Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Director at this years Academy Awards, and less surprisingly as Best Foreign Film. Perhaps Hollywood’s Academy voters want us to see there’s more to them than a civil war period piece or the rehash of a famous stage musical?





[1] Alec Barclay e-mail dated 17th January 2013 

Saturday, 10 April 2010

Easter Treats

A short visit from my daughter and her young man over the Easter holidays gave me an excuse to revisit some of my DVD collection (visitors get to choose the films) I reprint as follows:

By what criteria do you pass judgment on a film like Donkey Punch? One would assume purely on its entertainment value, but that would of course depend on what you find entertaining? Oliver Blackburn’s film tells the story of three northern girls on holiday in Mallorca, who befriend three male deck hands who invite them back to a luxury yacht to extend a party started earlier in a nightclub. The movie sells itself as a potent mix of sex, drugs and escalating violence. Yes there’s sex and yes there’s drugs and there’s certainly is violence, some of which is quite graphic. But it all leaves you quite cold as the film does not allow affinity with any of the character; you really don’t care who lives and who dies! Moderately entertaining and it does give Jaime Winstone a chance to show her assets.

Why did Michael Haneke recreate Funny Games as a shot by shot remake of the original, in English, ten years after the German language version? Haneke is on record that he always considered Funny Games to be an American story as he regarded the use of violence as a form of entertainment to be specifically American phenomenon! (That could form the subject of a good debate) Haneke invites the viewing audience to become accomplices and bear witness to the acts of terror performed by the pair of young, well spoken, white gloved serial killers. The film is unsettling and disturbing but un-miss able. Watch either version.

French new wave horror has become the edgiest and most brutal produced around the world. Now from the makers of Switchblade Romance comes this 2007 shocker from writer/director Xavier Gens Frontiers(s). During a not to distant French presidential election a gang of small time crooks goes on the run after a failed robbery. Seeking refuge in a seedy hostel deep in the middle of nowhere, their hoists turn out to be a family of degenerate neo-Nazi cannibals! Here they are subjected to all kinds of extreme mutilation and torture. I hate to admit that I loved every blood thirsty minute of this brutally shocking masterpiece.