Showing posts with label Serbian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Serbian. Show all posts

Friday, 2 May 2014

Cinema Komunisto.


One of the most interesting documentary’s I have seen recently was about something that I knew little about. Mila Turajlics Cinema Komunisto (2010) covers the politically charged history of Yugoslavian cinema from 1945 until 1991 and embraces the important part film lover Josip Broz, known to his countrymen as Tito, played in what was one of the leading film industry’s in Europe. It is also the story of a country that no longer exists - except in the movies.
 
Tito with his wife.
In June 1946 following the end of WW2 the government of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia created the State Committee of Cinematography to establish film production companies in various parts of the country. The first and the biggest was Avala Films located in the Socialist Republic of Serbia’s capital city Belgrade. Built and financed by the State it became an important part of Yugoslavia’s political regime that was happy to use it as a propaganda tool.  It produced its first feature film in 1947 and up until its last production, in the year 2000, the studio participated in the creation of 400 documentaries, 200 feature films and 120 co-productions with foreign companies; its pictures won more than 200 awards in various world wide film festivals. 


The Avala Film Studios.

When Yugoslavia split from the Soviet Union in 1948 it meant that no more films from the Mosfilm Studios were to be made or shown in Yugoslavia so the studio turned to America and managed to attract Hollywood productions and actors, including Yul Brynner, Richard Burton, Sophia Loren and Orson Welles to come and use their facilities. Two of the best-known movies were The Battle of Neretva (1969) starring Brynner, Welles, Hardy Kruger and Franco Nero with Picasso designing its film poster and The Battle of Sutjeska (1973) starring Burton as Tito. Both were historically correct patriotic war films depicting the role of the Yugoslavians in fighting the Nazis.  Avala Film Studios became known as the Hollywood of the East with an instruction from central government to ‘never let them (the American’s) notice they are not in Hollywood[1]  
 
Tito's private projectionist Leka Konstantinovic.
It was alleged by his own personal projectionist Leka Konstantinovic, a man who still obviously has a great regard for his own boss, that Tito, who was a big film fan, watched a movie every day for 32 years totalling 8801 films. His favourite genre was the Western. He also made sure that Yugoslavia had its own Film Festival each year at Pula.
 
Various A-List Hollywood stars came to Yugoslavia. Tito seen here with Elizabeth Taylor....

.... and here with Kirk Douglas. 

Jacques Ranciere the French philosopher said of the cinema that ‘The history of cinema is the history of the power to create history’ Allegedly in Tito’s Yugoslavia all school children, along with the countries workers were expected to see the films made in their own country.  Yugoslavia was second only to France for being a European country in which domestic films were more watched than foreign films. But unlike almost anywhere else behind the old Iron Curtain Western films were widely distributed.[2] A most interesting and informative piece of documentary film making that I would highly recommend.



[1] Liberated Cinema. The Yugoslav Experience by Daniel J Goulding first published in 1985. It was the first book on Yugoslav cinema written by a western scholar. Goulding’s interest started in 1972 by accident knowing nothing at that time about their film industry. Long visits and study trips between 1972 and 1980 resulted in the most thorough research into Yugoslavian films ever undertaken. To write about the films accurately Goulding had to watch hundreds of films without the help of any under titles. In 2002 he returned to the former Yugoslavia to carry out research for an update to his book.  
[2] Mila Turajlic. Interview Sight and Sound December 2012.

Saturday, 30 April 2011

A Serbian Film


Srdan Spasojevic would have us believe that his first feature film A Serbian Film (2010) is a political allegory about modern day of life Serbia and how their governing elite treats its people. He talks in an interview about the movie being a giant metaphor and how he treats real life as pornography, considering peoples lives as pure exploitation, with basic employment being viciously exploited by the employers. Violent scenes, he goes on to say, underline his strength of feeling with the main character although a porn star is part of a “perfect” family with a beautiful and educated wife and a happy and contented young child. The film is also meant to highlight the violence within the family, Serbian men can treat their women and children in what ever way they deem fit!

This films premise is fairly simple. Retired porn star Milos is lured back to his old profession by the promise of a very large amount of money and the prospect to push back the boundaries of pornographic art, an opportunity he decides that’s to good to miss, but too late, he finds out that film maker Vukmir is keener on creating a snuff video than making a cinematic work of art. Milos is kept docile, except where it counts, via a good dose of cattle aphrodisiac and therefore has no personal control over his actions.

There is no doubt that Serbia’s first truly independent film (financed by private funds and not the state) is controversial, coursing problems where ever and when ever it has been shown publicly and dividing viewers and critics alike. BBFC made 49 cuts amounting to 4 minutes and eleven seconds making it the most censored cinema release in Britain since 1994. The censoring was due to the sexual violence, sexualised violence and the portrayal of children in a sexualised and abusive content, although the director did make sure that the children where filmed separately which in turn avoided legal problems under the 1978 Protection of Children Act. The Serbian reaction to the film was, as elsewhere, mixed with certain sections of Serbian society thinking that it did not reflect a good image of the country and others having a view that it may attract outside filmmakers to make movies there, opening there film industry to the outside world.

So going back to my first paragraph do I believe the director when he states that his film is a political allegory or just a extreme blood, gore and sex horror movie that the French make so well? Spasojevic says his film is an honest approach to the subject matter and that the original message is hidden because of the cuts and that the film was not made with the sole intention of creating controversy.  But whatever the director states the film will continue to evoke strong reactions amongst it audience. What do I think? Well I think you should make every effort to see this film and make up your own mind. File next to Antichrist (2009)